Fuel Cells: Theory and Technology


Basic principles of operation

The fuel cell is an electrochemical system which converts the chemical energy of a conventional fuel, directly into d.c. electrical energy. The basic principle of operation is illustrated in Fig.1. A fuel cell comprises two porous electrodes, with a conducting electrolyte betwen them. At the anode,the hydrogen gives up electrons to the electrode, and enters the electrolyte as a positive ion (H+), while at the cathode, the oxygen takes electrons and enters the electrolyte as a negative ion (O2- or OH-). The respective ions combine in the electrolyte and form water, while the electrons move through the external circuit, to produce electric current. Since these systems do not rely on thermal energy conversion, they are not bounded by Carnot efficiency limitations.

When fuel other than hydrogen is used, fuel processing or reforming is required. The role of the reformer is to convert any fuel into a hydrogen rich stream of gas. This is attained by mixing the fuel with steam (typical steam-to-carbon-ratio: 2.5). An additional role of fuel processing, is to ensure that CO is converted to CO2 (gas shift conversion). Thus, steam temperature has to be high enough to favour the above chemical reaction.

Fig.1: Fuel cell - Principle of operation



Technical pros of fuel cell power plants

High Efficiency

As mentioned above, FC are not bounded by the thermodynamic laws that limit Carnot cycle efficiencies. This is due to the fact that chemical energy of a fuel is directly converted into electricity, without intermediate conversion into heat, as in conventional power schemes. Hence, theoretical FC efficiencies reach 83 %. However, practical values (without heat recovery) are about 50 %.

High Responsivity

A fuel cell is capable of being switched-on and operate at full power, in 30 ms. The efficiency is not affected by load variation, as long as it remains above 30 % of full load.

High Reliability and Low Maintenance

Because of their simplicity of operation and the absence of moving parts, fuel cells are very reliable and need only 1/4 of the routine maintenance of conventional systems. Additional components, such as coolers and blowers are highly reliable, because of their wide use in industry.

Long Life

Fuel cells have a projected life of 40,000 h of operation at full load.

Fuel Flexibility

The ideal fuel for optimum FC operation is hydrogen, although any two materials that can undergo an oxidation reaction, can be used as fuels for a FC system. The following fuels are considered:

  • Methane
  • Propane
  • Methanol
  • Ethanol
  • Natural Gas
  • Biogas
  • Petroleum
  • Coal
  • Naptha

Flexibility in Size and Applications

The current produced from a fuel cell is proportional to the electrode area, and the potential output can be increased to meet the necessary power levels, by stacking FC in piles.

Depending on its size and electrical output, a FC system can be used for a variety of apps, ranging from micro-scale power genration for modular buildings to large-scale power generation, possibly as prime povers in co-generation.

No Noise and Pollution free

The only source of noise is the small blowers, that are used for cooling and supplying the cell with air. The SOx and NOx emissions are negligible, while emission of greenhouse gases is much lower comparing to the conventional power schemes.

Thermodynamics

The basic thermodynamic expressions that govern fuel cells are depicted below:


Performance models

A description of the terms in the Gibbs energy equation and a detailed analysis of fuel cell performance and efficiencies are given in our technical reviews.

We have designed mathematical models for assessing the energy performance of fuel cell systems, and incorporated these models on spreadsheets. General information on the mathematical model , and details and the spreadsheets for the following types of fuel cells, are given in our assessment method pages:


Types of fuel cells

In order to obtain sufficient electrical output from a fuel cell, the electrochemical reaction must occur at a sufficient rate. In low temperature fuel cells (such as the PEM and PAFC described below), this is achieved using platinum catalysts. In high temperature fuel cells (such as the MCFC and SOFC), the rate of reaction is due to the temperature and use of less sensitive catalysts. The materials of construction of the different types of fuel cell limit the operating temperatures and sufficient cooling is provided to prevent damage to the fuel cell.

Reforming of the fuel to hydrogen is required for the hydrogen to water reaction to occur. The reforming reaction of methane takes place at temperatures circa 800C and absorbs some of the heat which results from the fuel cell reaction. Internal reforming may be used within the high temperature fuel cells. With low temperature fuel cells the temperature within the fuel cell is insufficient for the reforming reaction. Also, impurities such as CO or sulphur will poison the platinum catalysts so external reforming of the fuel to pure hydrogen is required for these types.

The main characteristics of the different types of fuel cells are described below.


  Fuel Cell Type
  Polymer
Electrolyte
Membrane
Phosphoric
Acid
Carbonate Solid
Oxide
Electrolyte Ion Exchange
Membrane
Phosphoric
Acid
Alkali Carbonates
Mixture
Yttria Stabilized
Zirconia
Operating Temp., °C 80 200 650 1,000
Charge Carrier H+ H+ CO3= O=
Electrolyte State Solid Immobilized
Liquid
Immobilized
Liquid
Solid
Cell Hardware Carbon- or
Metal-Based
Graphite-
Based
Stainless
Steel
Ceramic
Catalyst Platinum Platinum Nickel Perovskites
Cogeneration Heat None Low Quality High High
Fuel Cell Efficiency, %LHV <40 40-45 50-60 50-60

Fuel cell types Courtesy US Department of Energy

PAFC (Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells)

PAFCs have an operating temperature of 200 °C and a practical FC efficiency, epr , of 40%. It is the FC that has mostly been exploited, mainly due to its high grade heat, which can be used in small-scale CHP. The power output varies from 200 kW to 20 MW. The main disadvantage is that it has no self-starting capability, because at lower temperatures (40-50 °C) freezing of concentrated Phosphoric Acid occurs. In order to reduce losses, the cathode catalyst and the reformer need to be improved.

AFC (Alkaline Fuel Cells)

The operating temperature of AFCs is ~70 °C and their power ouptut is 10-100 kW. They have been widely used for space and defense applications, where pure hydrogen is used. Their excessive cost and sensitivity to CO2 , have restricted their research and development, no matter their high efficiency and power density.

PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane)

PEMs or SPEFC (Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells) were the first ones to find practical application. Having an operation temperature of 80 °C, a practical efficiency, epr , of 50%, and power output in the range of 5-200 kW, they are ideal for transortation and portable power. Additional advantages are their high response, the small size and low cost.

An attractive future development is the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC). This uses methanol as the fuel without the necessity for a reformer. Further development of the platinum group compound catalysts is required before a sufficient power density will be obtained for the cost of the precious metals.

MCFC (Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells)

MCFC is a very attractive technology, basically due to the simple overall plant design and because they don't need external reformers. Their high temperature of operation (600 °C) suggests their use in cogeneration. They have high practical efficiency (50%) and their power output may range from 500 kW to 60 MW. However, the significant corrosion problems of the electrodes and the catalyst have lagged their application.

SOFC (Solid Oxide Fuel Cells)

SOFCs have an operating temperature of 1000 °C and practical efficiency, epr , of 45%. It is a very promising technology, because they don't need external reforming, they have high fuel flexibility and high quality waste heat. One basic problem concerns the materials used. Although ceramics are quite cheap, they are difficult to fabricate in forms and shapes that can accommodate the high thermal stresses.


Fuel Cell Types and the Performance Models

Each one of the fore-mentioned types has different properties and operation characteristics, and thus different efficiencies, and heat and power output. In order to assess and compare their performance, we developed the Mathematical Model, based on fundamentals of electrochemical and mechanical engineering, and on published research work. The model has been applied successfully on the PEM, SOFC and PAFC. The fuel used for all three cases is methane, although in the spreadsheet, the possibility for methanol and ethanol exists. By considering the reforming process, the electrochemical reactions of the fuel cell itself and some assumptions on the irreversible losses, we are able to calculate the heat and power output and the thermal, electrical and overall efficiencies.

The model can easily be extended for other fuels and other types of FCs, although, in the case of MCFC, the fuel cell reactions should be considered carefully.

This assessment method can give even more accurate results, it the specifications of the heat exchangers, the control equipment and the dc/ac power converters are known.


Fuel Cells: Commercial Availability

The commercial availability of fuel cells is currently very limited but extensive development of manufacturing processes and setting up of production facilities is being undertaken, especially of PEM type fuel cells. Commercial availability of PEM fuel cells is expected imminently with an order of magnitude reduction in cost by 2010 compared with the currently available PAFC system. High temperature fuel cells are expected to be available by 2005.

For further details of the availability of the different fuel cell types and the leading suppliers see our technical review on the current and future commercial availability of fuel cells.


Fuel Cell Systems: Further Information

Further information on the practical aspects of fuel cells is provided on our review pages:


References

  1. J. Weisman, L.E. Eckart, Modern Power Plant engioneering, Prentice Hall, 1985,
  2. D.J. Lovering, Fuel Cells: Grove Anniversary Symposium '89, Journal of Power Sources, vol.29, No.1/2, Elsevier 1990,
  3. J.M. Scigliano, The role of FC in future energy scenarios, Energy Production Processes, IChemEng, 1988,
  4. K.F. Langley, Fuel cells: An appraisal of current research and future prospects ETSU, 1983,
  5. Fuel Cells: Trends in Research and Applications, UNESCO, 1985,
  6. A.J. Appleby, Fuel cell technology: status and future prospects, Energy, vol.21 no.7/8, 1996,
  7. http://www.gmi.edu/~altfuel/fcimages/fcdyn.jpg
  8. http://www.iesvic.uvic.ca/fuelcell/newsletter/
  9. http://www.fe.doe.gov/coal_power/fuel_cells/fc_sum.html


Return to top of page