As it was described
in the Methodology part of the Project Web Page, once the demand of
the Xscape site is reduced, the analysis of the supply side
can be undertaken. This way a total energy efficiency analysis
for construction villages
can be performed.
In this part of
this project an evaluation of the supply side is conducted
in order to improve the efficiency of the supply as well as reducing CO2 emissions.
In addition, the
use of efficient supply options such as Combined Heat and Power (CHP)
systems and Heat Pumps as well as renewable supply technologies has been studied.
Back to Top
The objectives of this study are to evaluate
alternative supply options for construction villages especially
focusing on Laing O'Rourke's Xscape site.
The alternatives have been studied by considering
different aspects of construction villages and
evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the different supply options in terms of economic, social and
environmental issues. In addition renewable supply technology that
is most suitable for construction sites shall be identified and
studied in more detail.
The study on Laing O'Rourke's Xscape site will be undertaken by considering the
current supply options: diesel generator and connection to the grid;
as well as the identified renewable solution.
Back to Top
For the evaluation of the supply side, the actual situation
of the supply is analysed using the Xscape site as reference in this
project. The following assumptions have been made for our analysis.
-
The power
output will be calculated by using the actual consumption
records (metering data) and applying the identified demand
reductions.
-
The demand reduction
is estimated according to the Demand Side study of this Project.
The topics studied have been:
-
Actual kWh
consumption
-
Reduction by
using Demand measures
-
Future kWh
consumption
-
Evaluation of
the actual supply: Diesel generator, connection to the grid.
-
Evaluation of
efficiency for : CHP and Heat Pumps system.
-
Evaluation of
Renewable options. RE selection.
-
The efficiency
results: combination of the supply systems.
The methodology to evaluate the supply side is shown in the
above flow chart.

Back to Top
The energy
consumption profile for each construction site varies continuously
and generally increases as a project progresses. The usual
practice of considering the annual energy demand is wholly
inappropriate for the construction business as projects varies in
both time and size.
In most
construction sites Diesel generators acts as a major source for
electricity supply, and thereby constitute to about 75 to 80 % of
the fuel costs. For the remaining one third of the project electricity
is used from the grid. It is important to note that the
carbon emissions resulting from electricity generation by diesel
generator are about twice those of mains electricity.
Electricity is used for space and water
heating, lighting and
electrical offices and catering equipment. A deep analysis of the energy use and the power installed
can be followed at the demand side analysis of this web site.
The profile of the supply is as following.
A)
In
terms of used devices:
The electricity required is obtained from a diesel generator
and directly from the grid through a grid connection.
B)
In terms of costs:
Following the figures we have obtained from Laing
O’Rourke, it can be estimated that the average expenditure in energy
(diesel and electricity) from a typical construction site could be
about £126,000 per year. Note that depending on every
company and every provider contract prices for fuel and electricity
from the grid could be different.
Although data for electricity consumption were obtained
for the Xscape
site those values can not be shown on this web site for
privacy reasons. Due to this the average value are assumed as the
energy expenditure on the Xscape site.
-
The diesel generator contributes to 88.16% of the
total cost of energy supply.
-
The electricity from the grid is about the 11.83% remained.
C)
In terms of time:
Along the project
duration the supply of a construction village is
typically
structured into the following periods.
-
2/3 parts of the project: supply by
diesel generators.
-
1/3 parts of the project: grid connection.
Back to Top
On almost all the construction villages, there is a
possibility to use temporary power supply from the grid. In order to connect to the grid some considerations must be
followed:
-
The dates
and other key programme dates
-
The location
of existing supply lines
-
Local and
seasonal environmental considerations
-
The
evaluation of the existing supply companies
-
The
evaluation of the different quotations, contracts and security
of supply from every company.
-
The
definition of the supply voltages required.
-
The earthing
requirements and proximity to communications equipment
-
The siting
and protection of metering, switchgear, distribution boards etc
-
The correct
rating of fuses and switchgear for safety and plant protection
-
The
arrangements for controlling, operating and maintaining the
system
-
The
provision of lockable switches and means of isolation
-
The
commissioning and handover arrangements
-
Future
modifications or extensions to the temporary supply system
Using some information obtained from experienced civil
engineers as well as referring to the Site Layout part of this web
site, it can be said that grid connection is not made until roughly
two thirds of the project is
because of the need to keep the electrical supply options flexible.
Temporary facilities are often moved around on site and diesel
generators are ideal for shunting around with the facilities.
Although ideally they should not be moved as this costs money and is
inefficient, it usually happens because of external uncontrolled
conditions and/or sometimes poorly planning. Furthermore, the connection
into the grid is delayed in order to reduce the risk of accidents by
damaging the electricity connections during the buildings
activities.
It is estimated that it takes between two to four weeks to get a
high capacity connection to the national grid. The electricity
from the grid is purchased at 7-8 p/kWh.
Back to Top
As it has been
shown in previous chapters of this report, power for the Xscape site
at the time of this study was provided mainly by a diesel
generator. The diesel generator supplied 66% of the electricity over
the whole project duration which incurred 80% of the total
electricity costs.
On the Xscape, a 200kVA generator is used to provide
electricity for lighting, space and water heating, office and catering
equipment in the site accommodation. A 27kVA generator is used
to supply electricity primarily for temporary lighting with some
subcontractors using this generator for their power tools.
Diesel
generators are the preferred
supply
systems on
sites mainly due to flexibility reasons as well as the ease of
obtaining the fuel supply. Nevertheless, some
problems are detected regarding diesel generators.
Every company has a different contract for their oil price but an
average of 20p/litre is considered as a good approximation of a
fixed oil price. Thus, at 35% maximum
generator
efficiency, the price of the diesel is estimated at 5.76 p/kWh.
However
the price of fuel varies in huge ranges and can be said to
increase significantly in the near future.
The efficiency of the generator is an important aspect to be
considered. The efficiency shows the relationship between the energy
use and the total power output from the generator.
On of the main problem is that diesel generators are mostly
operated only on part of their load. Following the curve shown in the
following figure,
the efficiency of a diesel generator is strongly related to the
load. Thus, with decreasing generator load the efficiency is
reducing accordingly. On the Xscape site the load of the generator is fixed at the
35.5% what means an efficiency of the 30%.
The lower the efficiency of the diesel
generator the higher is the amount of CO2 emitted by the
generator. Hence, at a load of 35.5% the
CO2 emissions from the generator are 0.72 kg/ kWh, which
means almost a 70% of
increase with respect to the standard of 0.43kg/kWh
CO2 applying to the
national grid.
Thus, electricity
produced by the generator is not more expensive than the electricity
purchased from the grid, the associated CO2 emissions are
extensively higher. This
shows that an alternative must be developed to reduce the CO2
emissions by improving the generator efficiency or by reducing the
generator use.
|