This project will apply the methodology, 
				outlined previously, to the construction village at 
				Laing O’Rourke’s Xscape site. The construction village consists of 26 modular contractor’s 
				cabin linked together over 2 storeys and 9 jackleg cabins used 
				by subcontractors.
				
				 
				
				Contractor’s accommodation is constructed to current Building 
				Regulations regarding their specification of insulation. 
				It is however, notable that the subcontractor’s cabins are of 
				an older model with poor insulation envelope.
				
				 
				
				The construction village consists of offices, meeting rooms, 
				toilets, canteen, kitchen and a drying room for both contractors 
				and subcontractors.
				
				  
			
			 Back to Top
				
				
				Our objectives are to demonstrate significant improvements 
				for chosen areas of the Xscape site by applying the energy 
				efficiency measures that were identified in the previous 
				section. By applying the first step of our methodology, which is 
				concerned with demand side management, to the Xscape site we 
				will achieve improvements in the following areas:
				
					
					1.      
					Energy Demand
					
					2.      
					Thermal Comfort
					
					3.      
					Environmental Impact
				
				
				Further outcomes from the Xscape study will be:
				
					
					1.      
					Investment costs
					
					2.      
					Payback Periods
			
			   
			    
				 Back to Top
				
			
				
				
				 
				
				 


 
 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				
				 
				
				 
				
				The first step of this study is to identify areas with a high 
				energy demand. In these areas we will then apply a number of 
				selected energy efficiency measures. In order to identify significant areas within the Xscape 
				site, the accommodation layout, the power installed in every 
				area, the quantity of a certain area as well as the periods of 
				energy usage have been studied, considering the information 
				obtained on the Demand Analysis of the Project Web Site.
				
					
					§        
					
					Xscape 
					contractor’s accommodation layout 
					
					§        
					
					Power 
					installed in every area 
					
					§        
					
					Periods 
					of energy usage
				
				
				Then, by studying the complete construction village we have 
				identified the following target areas:
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				            
				Offices                                   
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
 
				            
				Canteen
				 
				
				
				
				                                           
				
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				Drying 
				Room                                                           
				
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				
				           
				Subcontractor’s 
				Cabins                                                      
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				It shall be mentioned that the Xscape site contains 13 
				contractor’s offices, one contractor’s canteen and drying room 
				and 9 subcontractor’s cabins.
				
				 
				
				In the next step the appropriate energy efficiency measures 
				are identified which shall be implemented in the selected areas. These measures have previously been summarised in our demand 
				side study. The figure below shows the energy efficiency measures applied 
				to each area.
				
				 
				
				 
				
					
						| Offices • High frequency ballasts
 • Daylight control system
 • 1.5 kW heater with automatic control
 | Canteen • High frequency ballasts
 • Occupancy sensor for lights
 • 1.5 kW heater with automatic control
 • Ventilator (428m3/hr) with heat recovery 
						and CO2 sensor
 | 
					
						| Drying Room • High frequency ballasts
 • Occupancy sensor for lights
 • 1.5 kW heater with automatic control
 • Ventilator with 157m3/hr with heat recovery 
						and humidity sensor
 | Sub-contractor’s Cabins • Improved insulation
 • 36W T5 fluorescent lights
 • Occupancy sensor for lights
 • 1.5 kW heater with automatic control
 | 
				
				 
				
				
				
				
				
				The last step is to carry out an analysis for these areas 
				using the selected measures in comparison to their current 
				situation.
				
				 
				
			
			
			 Back to Top
				
			
				
				
				In this case study we conduct an analysis for the chosen 
				areas with the help of ESP-r. This is done by assessing our proposed situation in 
				comparison with the current situation on the construction site. The proposed situation is based on implementing previously 
				identified energy efficiency measures in the selected areas. 
				
				 
				
				This case study is based on the actual room sizes occurring in the 
				Xscape construction village and also takes into account the 
				surrounding area of the various rooms as well as the working 
				behaviour of all employees. Working hours are assumed to be 11 hours per day 
				for 5 days a week and 52 weeks per year. 
				The case study can be accessed via a link in the Demand Side 
				part of the Project Web site.
				
				 
			
			 
Back to Top
				
			
				
				
				In the 
				following all results arrived from the case study are tabular or 
				graphical listed for:
				
					
					·        
					
					The 13 
					contractor’s offices
					
					·        
					
					The 
					contractor’s canteen
					
					·        
					
					The 
					contractor’s drying room
					
					·        
					
					The 9 
					subcontractor’s cabins
				
				
				The main 
				results are listed in the table below.
				
				 
				 
				
					
						| 
						
						
						
						  
						
						
						
						Accommodation | 
						
						
						
						Annual Energy Savings 
						
						
						
						£ | 
						
						
						
						Capital Investment 
						
						
						
						£ | 
						
						
						Payback 
						Period 
						
						
						
						yrs | 
						
						
						Avoided 
						CO2 Emission kg/yr | 
					
						| 
						Offices | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Lighting | 
						221 | 
						2600 | 
						11.8 | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Heating | 
						1001 | 
						1690 | 
						1.7 | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Total | 
						1222 | 
						4290 | 
						3.5 | 
						
						11,258 | 
					
						| 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						Canteen | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Lighting | 
						206 | 
						1050 | 
						5.1 | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Heating | 
						113 | 
						520 | 
						4.6
						A | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Ventilation | 
						- | 
						
						615    | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Total | 
						241 | 
						2185 | 
						9.0 | 
						
						2,247 | 
					
						| 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						Drying room | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Lighting | 
						87 | 
						410 | 
						5 | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Heating | 
						1489 | 
						650 | 
						0.4 | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Ventilation | 
						- | 
						320 | 
						- | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Total | 
						1342 | 
						1380 | 
						1.0 | 
						
						12,395 | 
					
						| 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Subcontractor’s Cabins | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Lighting | 
						648 | 
						1800 | 
						2.8 | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Heating | 
						2160 | 
						2340 | 
						1.1
						B | 
						
						  | 
					
						| 
						
						Total | 
						2808 | 
						4140 | 
						1.5 
						/ 8.8 
						
						C | 
						
						26,109 | 
				
				
				Note:
				
				A 
				shorter payback period in case of unventilated space
				
				B 
				no consideration of extra hire costs for well insulated cabin
				
				C 
				considering an additional yearly hire charge of £260 for a well 
				insulated cabin
				 
				
				 
				
				
				Furthermore, 
				all results are shown in the following graphs.
				
			  
 
			
				
 
 
				 
				
				 
				
				
 
				
				                                                                                                                                                               
				
				 
				
				



				
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				
 
				
				                                                                                                                                                                
				
				





				
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				
 
				
				                                                                                                                                                                      
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				 
				
				
				
				
				Notes: 
				
				
				 
				
				
				1 Thermal comfort and thermal percentage dissatisfied are 
				stated for a typical winter day
				
				
				2 Thermal comfort: percentage of working hours with a dry 
				resultant temperature 20°C – 22°C
				
				3 There are two values on the Simple Payback Period for the 
				Sub-contractor's. The longer payback was calculated taking into account the extra hiring charges of good insulated 
				cabins while the shorter payback just assumed the company 
				purchasing from new. 
				 
				
				 
			
			 Back to Top
			 
			
			
			
			
			In conclusion the 
			following goals have been achieved:
			 
			
			
				- 
				
				Reduction of 
				annual energy demand 
- 
				
				Reduction of 
				annual energy cost 
- 
				
				Reduction of 
				annual carbon emissions  
- 
				
				Improvement 
				of thermal comfort 
- 
				
				Decreased 
				number of dissatisfied employees 
 
			
			
			
			It has been demonstrated that the application of energy efficiency 
			measures can lead, in the Xscape construction village, to 
			energy savings between 32% and 64% depending on the target area.
			
			 
			
			This report indicates that, because of their high 
			percentage of energy savings but relatively low payback periods, the 
			contractor’s offices and the drying room are primary targets for 
			implementing selected energy efficient lighting, heating and 
			ventilation equipment. In case of the drying room the application of 
			ventilators with heat recovery and humidity sensors will 
			additionally provide an effective environment for clothes to dry and 
			therefore solve a main problem faced on every construction site.
			
			 
			
			Changing the 
			subcontractor’s cabin on the Xscape site by hiring well insulated 
			cabins and applying selected heating and lighting measures requires 
			a high initial investment. However, improving subcontractor’s 
			accommodation will lead to a significant reduction in annual carbon 
			emissions which will contribute towards achieving national targets 
			and thus help to lead towards sustainable development.
			
			 
			
			Despite savings of energy and carbon emissions, by applying our 
			methodology in the Xscape construction village the environmental 
			comfort of all areas investigated will be enormously improved. This 
			will lead in to a working environment where employees are able to 
			work effectively due to the improved level of comfort.