Meeting the hotwater demand through the use of solar
collectors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
workbook shows the calculations involved in the determination of the most
suitable solar collector system for installation to produce the optimum
saving in CO2 |
|
|
when
compared to the level of CO2 which would be emiited if natural gas was used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
demand from hot water at the Rottenrow site is estimated to be |
|
|
|
21987 |
KWhr/annum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
associated release of CO2 from use of natural gas is |
|
|
0.13 |
Kg/KWhr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based
on a efficient modern boiler unit using natural gas as the fuel which
operates |
|
|
|
at
90 % efficiency the real consumption in KWhr necessary to supply the heating |
|
|
|
|
demand
is found by dividing the heating demand by 0.9. This gives a real heating
demand of |
|
|
|
24430 |
KWhr/annum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus
the associated release of CO2 from the use of natural gas to supply the fuel
hot water demand is |
|
|
3175.9 |
Kg CO2 / annum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type of solar |
number of solar |
|
natural gas saving |
area of collector |
total area of collector |
CO2 saving |
|
|
collector |
collectors |
|
per annum |
m2 |
m2 |
per annum |
|
|
|
deficit |
excess |
|
|
|
2 |
13208.1 |
601.193 |
11222.12222 |
3.041 |
6.082 |
1458.875889 |
|
|
MSC-32 solar collector |
4 |
11441.7 |
1987.45 |
12988.52222 |
3.041 |
12.164 |
1688.507889 |
|
|
with perfectly insulated |
6 |
10833.1 |
3589.28 |
13597.12222 |
3.041 |
18.246 |
1767.625889 |
|
|
tank of volume 0.03m2 |
8 |
10607.4 |
5030.81 |
13822.82222 |
3.041 |
24.328 |
1796.966889 |
|
|
|
10 |
10528.2 |
6274.08 |
13902.02222 |
3.041 |
30.41 |
1807.262889 |
|
|
|
12 |
10550.5 |
7351.94 |
13879.72222 |
3.041 |
36.492 |
1804.363889 |
|
|
|
14 |
10614.4 |
8326.04 |
13815.82222 |
3.041 |
42.574 |
1796.056889 |
|
|
|
16 |
10731 |
9243.7 |
13699.22222 |
3.041 |
48.656 |
1780.898889 |
|
|
|
18 |
10894.8 |
10139.5 |
13535.42222 |
3.041 |
54.738 |
1759.604889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It
is obvious from the above graph that the amount of CO2 saved does not change
significantly after the installation of 8 solar collectors, thus area area of
24.328 m2 and a CO2 saving of 1796.97 is resultant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of |
number of solar |
|
natural gas saving |
area of collector |
total area of collector |
CO2 saving |
total area of collector |
% of CO2 saving |
|
|
|
Solar collector |
collectors |
|
per annum |
m2 |
m2 |
per annum |
|
per annum |
|
|
|
|
deficit |
excess |
|
|
|
msc 32 |
2 |
12987.1 |
697.631 |
11443.12222 |
3.041 |
6.082 |
1487.605889 |
6.082 |
0.46840025 |
|
|
2 perfectly |
4 |
11018.1 |
2618.2 |
13412.12222 |
3.041 |
12.164 |
1743.575889 |
12.164 |
0.54899714 |
|
|
insulated
storage |
6 |
10361.2 |
5165.79 |
14069.02222 |
3.041 |
18.246 |
1828.972889 |
18.246 |
0.57588597 |
|
|
tanks |
8 |
10081.6 |
7522.6 |
14348.62222 |
3.041 |
24.328 |
1865.320889 |
24.328 |
0.58733081 |
|
|
|
10 |
9944.18 |
9591.48 |
14486.04222 |
3.041 |
30.41 |
1883.185489 |
30.41 |
0.59295581 |
|
|
|
12 |
9855.72 |
11419.8 |
14574.50222 |
3.041 |
36.492 |
1894.685289 |
36.492 |
0.59657674 |
|
|
|
14 |
9825.72 |
13038.8 |
14604.50222 |
3.041 |
42.574 |
1898.585289 |
42.574 |
0.59780472 |
|
|
|
16 |
9849.14 |
14500.6 |
14581.08222 |
3.041 |
48.656 |
1895.540689 |
48.656 |
0.59684607 |
|
|
|
18 |
9898.18 |
15824.8 |
14532.04222 |
3.041 |
54.738 |
1889.165489 |
54.738 |
0.59483872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It
can be seen that the optimal amount of installed solar collectors is approx 8
solar collectors with an area of 24.32m2 and a CO2 saving of 1865.32 KG per
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of |
number of solar |
|
natural gas saving |
area of collector |
total area of collector |
CO2 saving |
total area of collector |
% of CO2 saving |
|
|
Solar collector |
collectors |
|
per annum |
m2 |
m2 |
per annum |
|
per annum |
|
|
|
deficit |
excess |
|
|
|
msc 32 |
2 |
12833.9 |
847.929 |
11596.32222 |
3.041 |
6.082 |
1507.521889 |
6.082 |
0.47467117 |
|
|
with storage tank of volume |
4 |
10730.6 |
3290.4 |
13699.62222 |
3.041 |
12.164 |
1780.950889 |
12.164 |
0.56076535 |
|
|
preheat storage = 30m3 |
6 |
10016.9 |
6639.81 |
14413.32222 |
3.041 |
18.246 |
1873.731889 |
18.246 |
0.58997917 |
|
|
main storage = 150m3 |
8 |
9692.36 |
10415.8 |
14737.86222 |
3.041 |
24.328 |
1915.922089 |
24.328 |
0.60326354 |
|
|
|
10 |
9595.65 |
13949.5 |
14834.57222 |
3.041 |
30.41 |
1928.494389 |
30.41 |
0.60722216 |
|
|
|
12 |
9575.67 |
17299.4 |
14854.55222 |
3.041 |
36.492 |
1931.091789 |
36.492 |
0.60804 |
|
|
|
14 |
9612.23 |
20370.4 |
14817.99222 |
3.041 |
42.574 |
1926.338989 |
42.574 |
0.60654349 |
|
|
|
16 |
9692.97 |
23234 |
14737.25222 |
3.041 |
48.656 |
1915.842789 |
48.656 |
0.60323857 |
|
|
|
18 |
9831.12 |
25990.8 |
14599.10222 |
3.041 |
54.738 |
1897.883289 |
54.738 |
0.59758369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It
can be seen that the optimal amount of installed solar collectors is approx 8
solar collectors with an area of 24.32m2 and a CO2 saving of 1915.92 KG per
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table gives an indication of the different CO2 savings associated
with various volumes of storage associated with the solar collectors
collector |
|
|
|
|
volume of storage |
CO2 saving per annum |
|
|
0.03 |
1796.96 |
|
|
0.15 |
1865.32 |
|
|
150 |
1915.84 |
|
|
|
|
It
can be seen that there is a massive jump in the storage from 0.15 m3 to 150 m3 for a small increase in CO2
saving. |
|
|
|
|
Thus
the most optimal installtion of solar collectors is 8 solar collectors with
an installed area of around 25.32 m2 and storage of 0.15m2 per solar
collector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|