Here we will address:
"Everything is in balance and influences other things."
For example, the speed, direction and other characteristics of the wind influence:
Similarly, changing the size of windows in a building design affects:
These interactions are happening at any point in time but also integrated over time.
You can access more information under a variety of topics:
First published as:
`On the thermal interaction of building structure and heating and ventilating
system'.
Doctorate thesis by Jan L. M. Hensen, 1991.
The dynamic thermal interaction, under the influence of occupant behaviour and outdoor climate, between building and heating / cooling and ventilating system is still difficult to predict. In practice this often results in non-optimal, malfunctioning, or even "wrong" building / system combinations. Examples of problematic issues in this context are: sick building syndrome, the higher (comfort) requirements we have nowadays, systems in low-energy buildings (especially housing), industrial ventilation (including cleanroom problems), the `rules' used in building energy management systems, application of passive solar energy, HVAC system and control development and testing, design of integrated systems (eg floor heating, ice rink, swimming pool), and unusual building / system combinations which may occur for instance when a historical building finds a new destination (eg a church being converted into a multi-purpose centre) or in case of relatively new developments like atria, climate facades, time variant transparent systems, double-skin, ground coupled heat exchangers, etc.
The above mentioned problems and the need for an integral approach of the complete `building system' (consisting of building structure, occupants, heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, and prevailing outdoor conditions) is becoming more and more important due to a number of inter-related economical, technical, political and social developments:
Up to now the building design process is more or less sequential; first the building is designed and subsequently the heating / cooling / ventilating system. The dynamic thermal interaction is usually left out of consideration completely. Thermal comfort requirements are commonly reduced to required air temperature, neglecting other important thermophysiological environmental parameters like radiant temperature and air velocity. For system design, usually only extreme internal and ambient conditions are considered.
It is obvious that this cannot be the right approach for either thermal comfort or for energy consumption. So it is clear that there is definitively need for tools which enable an integral approach of the building and its plant system as a whole.
One could argue that the main objective of a building is to provide an environment which is acceptable to the building users. Whether or not the indoor climate is acceptable, depends mainly on the tasks which have to be performed in case of commercial buildings, whereas in domestic buildings acceptability is more related to user expectation.
As illustrated in Figure 1 a building's indoor environment is determined by a number of sources acting via various energy and mass transfer paths. The main sources may be identified as:
These sources act upon the indoor climate via various energy and mass transfer processes:
The indoor climate may be controlled by the occupants basically via two mechanisms:
Within the overall configuration as sketched in Figure 1, several sub-systems may be identified each with their own dynamic thermal characteristics:
The cycle periods of the exitations acting upon the system are also highly diverse. They range from something in the order of seconds for the plant, via say minutes in case of the occupants, to hours, days and years for the outdoor climate. From the above it will be apparent that we are indeed addressing a very complicated dynamic system.
Without attempting to be complete, the main energy flowpaths in buildings include:
Conduction |
- k (W/mK) function of temperature & moisture - real and apparent - isotropic and anisotropic - related parameters rho, Cp - derived parameters eg thermal diffusivity (k/rho Cp) |
Convection |
- hc (W/m2K) - usually evaluated from empirical expressions - these typically depend on:
|
Long-wave Radiation |
- hr (W/m2K) - black and grey body - emissivity & shape factors - specular and diffuse reflections - non-absorbing media - surface-to-surface temperature difference |
Short-wave Radiation |
- sky short-wave distribution - direct and diffuse components - surface transmittance, absorptance and reflectance - geometrical relationships (eg shading devices) - non-absorbing media |
Air Flow |
- pressure distribution causes pressure differences - affected by terrain roughness and local obstructions - stack effect - leakage distribution - temperature distribution - incompressible fluid |
Casual Gains |
- stochastic - sensible & latent components - convective/ radiant split - electrical power component |
Control |
- sensed condition/location - signal lag - actuated condition/ location - regulation `law' (on/off, PID, etc.) |
Climate |
- Idn & Igh, Ifh, Tdb,Twb, Wd & Ws, RH - Tsky, CC, Tgrd, Rainfall - severity and typicallity |
HVAC & Other Plant |
- components - connections - steady-state or dynamic - building link |
Having identified the need for tools which enable an integral approach of the complex dynamic system incorporating the building and its HVAC system, we are now able to state the aim of this course: introduction of building performance evaluation tools which treat the building and plant as an integrated, dynamic system.
There may be several alternative ways to achieve the objective identified above. However, one of the most powerful tools currently available for the analysis and design of complex systems, is computer simulation. As Aburdene (1988) points out:
"Simulation is the process of developing a simplified model of a complex system and using the model to analyze and predict the behaviour of the original system. Why simulate ? The key reasons are that real-life systems are often difficult or impossible to analyze in all their complexity, and it is usually unnecessary to do so anyway. By carefully extracting from the real system the elements relevant to the stated requirements and ignoring the relatively insignificant ones (which is not as easy as it sounds), it is generally possible to develop a model that can be used to predict the behaviour of the real system accurately."
Given the (increasing) complexity of energy/ environmental systems, computer modelling and simulation is emerging as a viable approach to design and performance evaluation. This class aims to give an understanding of the theoretical and operational principles underlying this new technology.
Aburdene, M.F. 1988. Computer simulation
of dynamic systems,
Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA.
Did you actually already explore the Introductory Course which introduces the concepts of building energy modelling and simulation through examples?